VOL 21 ISSUE #2

They admit it straight out. It is right there on the company home page. They are a heavy construction contractor that “specializes in complex, logistically challenging projects in hard-to-reach places.”

Knik Construction Co., Inc., based in Anchorage, Alaska, appears to thrive on the difficult construction, dredging, and paving projects that most would be intimidated to take on. A perfect example is a project they have in Yakutat, which is located on that dangle of land that hugs Canada off the southeast corner of the state or the Inside Passage. Yakutat, Alaska, as described by its own chamber of commerce, is “located along the rugged Alaskan Gulf Coast between Sitka and Cordova. Bounded by the Gulf of Alaska on the south, nearly impenetrable mountains to the north, and coastal glaciers to the east and west, Yakutat is about as remote as one can get in Alaska. There are no roads leading into or out of Yakutat. All commerce and access must occur via air or sea.”

Pavement Rehab Project

For Knik Construction, that chamber of commerce description is more alluring than what is found in a travel brochure for the Bahamas. The adrenaline-pumping project that took them to this picturesque village is the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Funding (ADOT&PF) Yakutat Airport Runway Pavement Rehabilitation project. In Alaska, the state DOT maintains all the airports.

The Yakutat Airport (YAK) is a state-owned, public-use airport located three nautical miles (6 km) southeast of the central business district of Yakutat. For the approximately 600 residents of Yakutat, this two-runway airport is critical.

“Our project was the asphalt resurfacing of Runway 11/29, which is 8,136 ft x 194 ft (2,480 m x 59 m), plus a 300 ft (91.44 m) taxiway,” said Amanda Gilliland, P.E., project manager with Knik Construction Co. “For the project, the runway was divided into three sections—raising the 29 end, which tapered from the existing runway to an elevated 2½ ft (0.76 m), a middle section where the runways intersect, that required varied profile milling, and a final section that needed ½-in (1.27 cm) surface milling, which was enough to remove the texture grooves.”

 


 

Logistical Challenge

The four-month project was a logistical challenge. All the heavy equipment, asphalt plant, supplies, and asphalt material had to be shipped via barge, which came to Yakutat once a month.

“We needed to carefully plan our shipments, because if anything was forgotten, we were stuck until the next month’s barge, or we would need to fly it in,” Gilliland stated. “It also meant that we needed very reliable equipment with maintenance up to date—we wouldn’t want to send a truck over on the barge that needs new tires in a week.”

Roadtec Equipment Advantage

Knik had a three-worker milling crew. They used a Roadtec RX900e with 12.5-ft (3.81 m) cutting drum. The machine features a Tier 4i Caterpillar C27 950 hp (700 kW) at 1,800 rpm engine and 14-in (35.56 cm) maximum cutting depth.

A total of 6,000 tons (5,443 tonnes) of millings were removed, which was mixed with 50 percent D-1 aggregate base and reused as fill on the section of the runway that required elevation to alleviate water issues.

“Working in a remote location, it’s beneficial to try to reuse immediately rather than stockpile, since the pile could sit for years or longer before it would be used as fill or RAP,” said Gilliland. “To ensure accurate milling depth, our cold planer is equipped with GPS machine control.”

For the Yakutat Airport runway, Knik shipped over to the remote location two Roadtec SB-2500e Shuttle Buggy material transfer vehicles (MTVs) to be paired up with pavers, along with other equipment.

There were two paving crews with six workers each, plus eight locally hired truck drivers. For the most part, the existing runway served as the base for the paving.

“Shuttle Buggies worked great—we rarely do any paving without them,” Gilliland stated. “They give us consistency of hot-mix asphalt (HMA) temperature and ensure against segregation … we’ve been using them a long time and, quite honestly, couldn’t imagine doing any large paving projects without them.”

According to Gilliland, the two MTVs kept both pavers productive and in instances where there was not adequate space for the trucks to dump, the belly dump could offload in another area and the Shuttle Buggy would pick up the pile from there and transport it back to the paver—without having to stop the paver. The Shuttle Buggy has 25 tons (22.7 tonnes) storage capacity.

Biggest Paving Project

The Yakutat Airport project required 62,000 tons (56,245 tonnes) of HMA making it the biggest paving project in Alaska for 2016. On a good production day, Knik Construction paved as much as 6,000 tons (5,443 tonnes), leaving the top lift of the runway with very few transverse joints. The company used infrared cameras to shoot the pavement right after it’s placed to confirm that there are no temperature variations—cold spots in the mat.

“The Shuttle Buggy uses a triple auger mixing technology which equalizes temperatures and evenly mixes large and small particles,” Gilliland said. “The asphalt spec for the job talks about the HMA temperature requirement and the thermal segregation penalty, and also the requirement of using a MTV on the job.”

It is interesting to see how the ADOT&PF describes the use of MTVs for its YAK Airport Runway Pavement Rehabilitation project:

401-4.15 Material Transfer Device/Vehicle (MTD/V)

Direct transfer of asphalt concrete pavement from the hauling equipment to the paving machine will not be allowed during paving of the top layer. A self-propelled Material Transfer Vehicle equipped with remixing auger(s), (e.g., Roadtec Shuttle Buggy) shall be used to deliver the asphalt concrete pavement from the hauling equipment to the lead paver. The trailing paver shall receive hot-mix asphalt from a separate Material Transfer Vehicle, or a Material Transfer Device such as a windrow pick-up machine. Asphalt concrete pavement placed in irregularly shaped and/or minor areas, such as “elephant ear” tapers, are excluded from this requirement.

The MTD/V shall distribute the asphalt concrete pavement on the prepared surface without segregation to obtain a smooth mixture of uniform temperature and texture throughout the finished surface.

With the project coming close to completion, Gilliland said: “Even with the numerous rain delays, the challenging logistics getting equipment and supplies, we’re proud that we’re completing the largest asphalt paving project in the state this year and that we earned quality bonuses for the composition and density of our finished paved surface. This is definitely a unique project that all of us working on will remember for years to come.”

BACK TO ISSUE